Skip to content

January 14, 2013

1

FDIC Changes for IOLTAs

by WSBA
FDIC and IOTLA
New Year brings changes to federal law affecting deposit insurance coverage for IOLTAS.

FDIC and IOLTAWith Congress failing to take action to extend unlimited coverage, as of Jan.1, 2013, FDIC insurance available to IOLTA accounts is limited to the standard amount of $250,000 per owner of the funds (client), per financial institution, assuming that the account is properly designated as a trust account and proper accounting of each client’s funds is maintained.

Since November 2008, a series of temporary federal laws have operated to provide unlimited FDIC deposit insurance coverage for most IOLTA accounts. For the past two years, IOLTA and non-interest-bearing accounts enjoyed unlimited FDIC insurance coverage under Section 343 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. That provision was effective for two years with a sunset date of Dec. 31, 2012.

Now, funds deposited in IOLTAs are no longer insured under the Dodd-Frank Deposit provision.  However, because IOLTAs are fiduciary accounts, they generally qualify for “pass-through” coverage (the insurance coverage passes through the fiduciary-depositor to the client-owner’s funds) on a per-client basis.  FDIC regulations provide that deposit accounts owned by one party but held in a fiduciary capacity by another party are eligible for pass-through deposit insurance coverage if:

  1.  The deposit account records generally indicate the account’s custodial or fiduciary nature; and
  2. The details of the relationship and the interests of other parties in the account are ascertainable from the deposit account records or from records maintained in good faith and in the regular course of business by the depositor or by some person or entity that maintains records for the depositor.

To meet the FDIC requirements, a lawyer should ensure that:

  • The fiduciary nature of the account is disclosed in the account title (e.g., Lawyer Doe  Client Trust Account);
  • The account contains the tax identification number of the Legal Foundation of Washington for IOLTA accounts (91-1263533); and
  • The identities and interests of the clients can be determined from records maintained in the regular course of business by the depositor (e.g., John Doe Law Firm). Properly accounting for client trust funds is crucial in identifying the fund amounts that belong to each client in the event an FDIC insurance claim is filed. At the minimum, proper accounting means identifying the client on whose behalf each deposit or withdrawal is made, keeping running balances in all account registers, and regularly reconciling the balance belonging to each client. For complete ethical requirements on maintenance of trust account records, see RPC 1.15B.

If an IOLTA does qualify for pass-through coverage as a fiduciary account, then each separate client for whom a law firm holds funds in an IOLTA may be insured up to $250,000. For example, if a law firm maintains an IOLTA with $250,000 for Client A, $150,000 for Client B, and $75,000 for Client C, the account would be fully insured if the IOLTA meets the requirements for pass-through coverage.

However, if the clients have other funds at the same institution, those funds would be added to their respective shares of the funds in the IOLTA for insurance coverage purposes, with the aggregate balance insured up to $250,000. For example, if a law firm maintains an IOLTA with $150,000 attributable to Client A, and Client A has $200,000 deposited in a certificate of deposit at the same FDIC-insured depository institution, then Client A’s funds would only be insured for up to $250,000 and uninsured for the remaining balance of $100,000.

Even though applicable ethics rules do not require that all of a client’s funds on deposit in a trust account be insured within the $250,000 FDIC insurance-coverage limits, as a matter of due diligence a lawyer should consider taking precautions, for example:

  • Informing clients about the location of the IOLTA account (or Separate Interest-bearing Individual Trust Account), and applicable FDIC insurance coverage limits (e.g., “The deposit insurance coverage applicable to your funds at [name of bank] is limited to $250,000. The $15,000 I am holding in trust for you counts towards that insurance coverage at [name of bank]. If you have additional funds in the same institution approaching or exceeding the insurable limit, you may wish to make other arrangements so that all of your deposits there remain insured.”)
  • Exercising ordinary prudence by taking reasonable steps to investigate a bank’s financial solvency if a lawyer has deposited client funds exceeding the FDIC deposit insurance coverage limits.
  • Dividing the funds into trust accounts at different financial institutions to maximize the client’s deposit insurance coverage if you hold more than $250,000 in trust for any one client.

More Information and Resources

Find more detailed information and resources here, or contact WSBA Professional Responsibility Counsel via the WSBA Ethics Line at 206.727.8284 or the WSBA Audit Manager, 206.727.8242.


More 2013 Changes

View information about the new IRS regulations affecting lawyers who accept debit and credit card payments from clients.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to comments

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,858 other followers