In February, the Oregon State Bar issued Formal Opinion 2026-208, allowing law firms to use autonomous AI for client intake with qualifications. Lawyers must understand and oversee AI interactions to avoid misrepresentation or unintended attorney-client relationships. The opinion stresses lawyer responsibility for accuracy in AI-generated work product.
Read More…
The author, Fabiola Jimenez, shares her journey from burnout in her legal career to founding LawMera, a law firm aimed at empowering her community in Washington’s legal desert. Through the WSBA Trial Advocacy Program, she gained practical litigation skills, built a supportive network, and learned the importance of authenticity, proactive action, and thorough preparation.
Read More…
The latest issue of Washington State Bar News highlights the Courthouse Dogs Foundation, showcasing how service dogs like Jeeter help alleviate stress for vulnerable witnesses in the legal system. It also examines Whole Genome Sequencing in a current murder case, discusses personal injury cases, and covers ethics regarding client confidentiality.
Read More…
The U.S. District Court for Oregon imposed severe sanctions on attorneys and their client in a case involving the use of AI-generated fake citations and quotes in court briefs. The court dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice, fined the lead attorney $15,500, and emphasized the importance of verifying citations to avoid misconduct.
Read More…
Employers face ongoing challenges in handling discrimination and harassment investigations. Key issues include managing retaliation concerns from witnesses, addressing the presence of represented parties, and ensuring effective communication with impacted employees. Properly conducted investigations are essential to sustain a compliant workplace and prevent costly claims and lawsuits.
Read More…
WSBA President Francis Adewale and Executive Director Terra Nevitt issue a call for reunification around what binds legal professionals and our communities. In the brief interview that follows Adewale and Nevitt explain why they wrote their statement on immigration enforcement, what they hope to accomplish alongside other Washington legal professionals, and what all legal professionals can do.
Read More…
The “actual innocence” requirement in legal malpractice claims against criminal defense attorneys necessitates plaintiffs to prove they did not commit the crime linked to alleged negligence. Jurisdictions like Washington, Alaska, and Oregon have their variations, complicating malpractice lawsuits. Recent cases reveal nuances that could shape future interpretations and applications of this requirement.
Read More…
A recent Advisory Opinion clarifies that a purchasing lawyer cannot use the selling lawyer’s name in their firm name after buying a law practice. This prohibition, rooted in professional conduct rules, aims to prevent misleading communications about lawyers’ affiliations, ensuring transparency and protecting clients’ understanding. Ethical compliance is emphasized.
Read More…