A federal court in Tacoma sanctioned a lawyer for submitting inaccurate filings generated using AI tools due to her lack of understanding of the technology. Despite her apology, the court emphasized that ignorance is not a valid excuse for errors in legal practice. The lawyer received a $3,000 fine and future certification requirements.
Read More…
As a legal nurse, I help attorneys make sense of the medical data in their cases. Medical records often contain hundreds, or even thousands of pages, and pinpointing what truly matters requires both clinical expertise and context. Knowledge gaps can create barriers to justice. When attorneys review medical data alone, they risk overlooking or misinterpreting details that are essential for getting justice for their clients. Consider some common scenarios. In personal injury and medical malpractice cases, attorneys frequently rely on Department of Insurance reports to establish fault and standard-of-care failures. This approach doesn’t account for preexisting conditions, alternate causation, or future care needs that help protect against the defense and increase case value.
Read More…
Advisory Opinion 202602 provides guidance for Washington lawyers on the complexities of the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). It clarifies that mere knowledge of an opposing party’s unlicensed representation does not constitute “assisting” in UPL. Lawyers must communicate with clients regarding UPL risks and remain vigilant in their ethical duties.
Read More…
The Alaska Bar’s Ethics Opinion 2026-01 addresses the complexities of attorney withdrawal, emphasizing the ongoing duty of confidentiality. It outlines procedures for disclosing information to the court and advises using mechanisms like sealed filings to protect client privacy. The opinion resembles Washington’s guidelines, providing clarity for lawyers navigating withdrawal disclosures.
Read More…
When we hear the phrase “claim against a lawyer,” most of us, understandably, think of negligence-based legal malpractice claims. The Idaho Supreme Court recently provided a reminder that lawyers there are also subject to breach of fiduciary duty and Consumer Protection Act claims. Estate of Kalinski v. Murphy Law Office, PLLC, __ Idaho __, 2026 WL 1216976 (Idaho 2026), […]
Read More…
In healthcare litigation, patient grievance logs are vital evidence, revealing organizational awareness of safety concerns. Federal regulations mandate hospitals to track and address grievances, influencing liability and institutional negligence claims. Properly managed grievance processes and multidisciplinary reviews are crucial for regulatory compliance and effective risk management in hospitals.
Read More…
On May 1, legal professionals gathered in Olympia to emphasize the rule of law to students from the YMCA Youth Legislature. WSBA President Frances Adewale urged youth to engage with civic responsibilities. The event launched a campaign for legal professionals to teach civics in classrooms by Constitution Day, Sept. 17.
Read More…
In 2025, Washington’s legal community emphasized unity around the rule of law, calling for action. The Rule of Law Ambassador Program is engaging future leaders by urging legal professionals to volunteer in schools on Constitution Day 2026, aiming to instill a passion for the law and inspire future democratic leadership.
Read More…
Disputes over trust account funds present challenges for lawyers, especially when representing children whose parents paid for their services. Advisory Opinion 202503 provides guidance on managing these funds, emphasizing adherence to Washington State Rules of Professional Conduct. Key duties include maintaining disputed funds in trust and resolving conflicts through communication and legal action when necessary.
Read More…
In February, the Oregon State Bar issued Formal Opinion 2026-208, allowing law firms to use autonomous AI for client intake with qualifications. Lawyers must understand and oversee AI interactions to avoid misrepresentation or unintended attorney-client relationships. The opinion stresses lawyer responsibility for accuracy in AI-generated work product.
Read More…
The U.S. District Court for Oregon imposed severe sanctions on attorneys and their client in a case involving the use of AI-generated fake citations and quotes in court briefs. The court dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice, fined the lead attorney $15,500, and emphasized the importance of verifying citations to avoid misconduct.
Read More…
Employers face ongoing challenges in handling discrimination and harassment investigations. Key issues include managing retaliation concerns from witnesses, addressing the presence of represented parties, and ensuring effective communication with impacted employees. Properly conducted investigations are essential to sustain a compliant workplace and prevent costly claims and lawsuits.
Read More…
WSBA President Francis Adewale and Executive Director Terra Nevitt issue a call for reunification around what binds legal professionals and our communities. In the brief interview that follows Adewale and Nevitt explain why they wrote their statement on immigration enforcement, what they hope to accomplish alongside other Washington legal professionals, and what all legal professionals can do.
Read More…
The “actual innocence” requirement in legal malpractice claims against criminal defense attorneys necessitates plaintiffs to prove they did not commit the crime linked to alleged negligence. Jurisdictions like Washington, Alaska, and Oregon have their variations, complicating malpractice lawsuits. Recent cases reveal nuances that could shape future interpretations and applications of this requirement.
Read More…
A recent Advisory Opinion clarifies that a purchasing lawyer cannot use the selling lawyer’s name in their firm name after buying a law practice. This prohibition, rooted in professional conduct rules, aims to prevent misleading communications about lawyers’ affiliations, ensuring transparency and protecting clients’ understanding. Ethical compliance is emphasized.
Read More…
The Washington Court of Appeals recently ruled on attorney-client privilege in receivership cases, affirming that a receiver can control a corporation’s privilege. In the Matter of Elcon Corporation, the court held the receiver can compel the production of privileged emails from Elcon, consistent with RCW 7.60.060(1)(c) and bankruptcy precedent.
Read More…