Skip to content

Posts from the ‘health law section’ Category

15
Sep
Dentist treats a young girl in cowgirl boots

New Law Opens Dental Practice Ownership to Those Not Licensed to Practice

Dental support organizations are typically not owned by dentists, so historically they use creative methods to operate in Washington. Until recently, state law required any entity providing dental services to be owned and controlled by licensed dentists. A new law opens that door, while placing clear restrictions and patient protections.

Read more

8
Sep
Two Social Security Cards

Navigating Inherent Bias in Social Security Law

In a perfect world, there’d be less need for the safety nets of Social Security, and no one who warranted disability would be denied because of administrative or subjective biases. This world isn’t perfect, though, and biases exist to the point where a whole industry has been formed to get unduly denied and disabled Americans the support they have been and are guaranteed by Congress and the law.

Read more

27
Mar

Mental Health Professionals Now Subject to Expanding Tort Liability

Worried female psychiatrist speaking to client
A recent Supreme Court ruling extends psychiatrists’ duty to people harmed by their client even if the client never mentioned a threat.

Worried female psychiatrist speaking to clientThe Washington Supreme Court recently extended the potential duty a psychiatrist owes to people harmed by their outpatient clients. In Volk v. DeMeerleer, 187 Wn.2d 241, 386 P.3d 254 (2016), the Court extended this potential duty to protect despite the absence of any threat to others made by the patient to the psychiatrist. This decision may have detrimental, long-lasting consequences for mental health professionals in Washington. Read more »

20
Jul

Court of Appeals Revisits ‘Who Is the Client?’ Question in Insurance Defense

who?
The Court of Appeals recently reaffirmed Washington’s “one client” standard for insurance company defense counsel.

whoThe Court of Appeals recently reaffirmed Washington’s “one client” standard for insurance company defense counsel.
Read more »

24
Jun

Emerging Regional Consensus: Prohibiting Indemnification by Plaintiffs’ Counsel

law books
Rules in Washington and other northwest states protect settling defendants from outstanding Medicare liens.

Law booksIn 1997, the Bar issued ethics advisory opinion No. 1736, addressing whether a claimants’ counsel could indemnify a settling defendant to protect the defendant from outstanding liens that might encumber the settlement. The Bar concluded that the answer was “no” because that would constitute a form of financial assistance beyond the narrow parameters of the rules of professional conduct 1.8(e). Read more »