Skip to content

Posts from the ‘Case Law Updates’ Category

6
Aug

What Is a ‘Necessary’ Witness under the Lawyer-Witness Rule?

A young lawyer takes the witness stand in court
The Court of Appeals weighs in on the meaning of “necessary witness” when considering if a trial counsel can be called to the stand.

A young lawyer takes the witness stand in courtThe Court of Appeals weighs in on the meaning of “necessary witness” in considering when a trial attorney can be called to the stand in his own case. Read more »

20
Jul

Court of Appeals Revisits ‘Who Is the Client?’ Question in Insurance Defense

who?
The Court of Appeals recently reaffirmed Washington’s “one client” standard for insurance company defense counsel.

whoThe Court of Appeals recently reaffirmed Washington’s “one client” standard for insurance company defense counsel.
Read more »

14
Jan

Dwyer v. Cappell: Court upholds lawyer’s right to quote judges’ praise in website advertising

quotes
Should you quote a judge in marketing for your firm?

quotesIn advertising on your law firm website, wouldn’t you love to feature praise like this from judges?

[Your name here] is, I think, an exceptional lawyer, one of the most exceptional lawyers I’ve had the pleasure of appearing before me…

Read more »

17
Jul

SCOTUS in Review: Riley v. California & United States v. Wurie

SCOTUS
Get an update on the first SCOTUS decision to bring modern context to Fourth Amendment jurisprudence.

SCOTUSWhile the media is embroiled in the controversy surrounding the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby decision, the Supreme Court also made a significant Fourth Amendment ruling in People v. Riley, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 44997 (2014). The case creates a bright line rule against warrantless searches of cell phones under the search incident to arrest doctrine (SITA). It is the first SCOTUS decision to bring modern context to antiquated Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. This decision is consistent with the recent trend of SCOTUS decisions affording more protection to the privacy of individuals. See, e.g., McNeely. Read more »

11
Jun

“Can I Testify via Skype?” Using Videoconferencing Technology to Enhance Remote Witness Testimony

Skype in the courtroom
Learn more about the benefits and drawbacks of Skype testimony.

Skype in the courtroom“Can I testify via Skype?”

This great question was first posed to us by an international family law client two years ago. While it seemed like a basic inquiry to our client, it took two years to arrive at a definitive answer. The Court of Appeals would only offer guidance once the same case was appealed, on the basis that the trial court abused its discretion when Skype testimony was ultimately allowed. On Feb. 20, 2014, the Court of Appeals Division II issued a decision upholding the use of Skype in Marriage of Swaka. (Marriage of Swaka, 319 P.3d 69 (2014))

We have long supported the use of court calls and witness testimony by phone, but what about Skype, or a similar program that allows for the contemporaneous transmission of testimony without losing the ability for the court to observe the physical attributes, mannerisms, and body language of a witness? What if we could save litigants and witnesses the cost and burden of long-distance travel and increase the information available to the court? Read more »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,507 other followers